奥尔森（Olson）在《集体行动的逻辑》中为何认为大集团比小集团更难合作？
Why does Olson argue in The Logic of Collective Action that large groups cooperate less easily than small ones?
奥尔森指出，集团越大，单个成员贡献对总收益的边际影响越小、搭便车的相对收益越高，理性个体因此倾向不出资。小集团因每人份额大更易克服惰性，大集团则需选择性激励才能动员。
Olson notes that in larger groups each member's contribution barely moves the total benefit while free-riding yields private gain, so rational individuals withhold effort. Small groups, where each share is large, overcome inertia more easily; large ones need selective incentives to mobilize.
难度 专业 · 适合 高中(15-18)
CC BY 4.0 · 已核验 · Verified 2026-11-02
来源 · Source
奥尔森《集体行动的逻辑》(1965)
Mancur Olson, The Logic of Collective Action (1965)
独立核验依据 · Independent verification: 核验依据 1 OPENLIBRARY 标识 /works/OL108561W：The logic of collective
#集体行动 #搭便车 #奥尔森
网络时代的「连接行动」（connective action）如何改变了社会动员的方式？
How has connective action in the networked era changed how social mobilization works?
班尼特（Bennett）与赛格伯格提出，数字媒体使个人基于可分享的「个性化框架」自发协调，无需传统层级组织。相较于依赖领导与资源的「集体行动」，连接行动以松散、去中心、情感化的在线网络快速聚集。
Bennett and Segerberg argue digital media let individuals coordinate via shareable personalized frames without traditional hierarchical organizations. Compared with resource-dependent collective action, connective action aggregates through loose, decentralized, affect-laden online networks.
难度 专业 · 适合 高中(15-18)
CC BY 4.0 · 已核验 · Verified 2026-10-04
来源 · Source
Bennett & Segerberg,《The Logic of Connective Action》(2012)
Bennett & Segerberg, The Logic of Connective Action (2012)
独立核验依据 · Independent verification: 核验依据 1 ISBN 9781139198752 (2014)
#连接行动 #数字动员 #社会运动
什么是社会运动（social movement）？它通常包含哪些构成要素？
What is a social movement, and what elements does it typically comprise?
社会运动是有组织、持续地追求或抵制社会变迁的集体努力。通常包含共同诉求、非正式网络、集体身份认同与抗议性行动 repertoires（游行、请愿等）等要素。
A social movement is an organized, sustained collective effort to pursue or resist social change. It typically comprises shared grievances, informal networks, a collective identity, and a repertoire of contention such as marches and petitions.
难度 进阶 · 适合 大众
CC BY 4.0 · 来源待核验 · Source pending review
来源 · Source
出处备注：著录含书名，但缺版次 / 出版社 / 年份中的一部分，需编辑补全后才能做独立比对。
蒂利《社会运动,1768-2004》(2004)
Charles Tilly, Social Movements, 1768-2004 (2004)
#社会运动 #集体行动 #社会变迁
哈丁（Hardin）的「公地悲剧」说明了什么集体困境？
What collective dilemma does Hardin's tragedy of the commons illustrate?
哈丁以公共牧场为例：每个牧民为私利增加牲畜，个体理性导致草场枯竭这一集体恶果。它说明在开放进入、缺乏产权或规则的公共资源上，自由使用必然走向耗竭。
Hardin's pasture example shows each herder adds livestock for private gain, and individual rationality exhausts the commons, a collective loss. It shows that open-access resources without property rights or rules are inevitably depleted by free use.
难度 进阶 · 适合 初中(12-15)
CC BY 4.0 · 来源待核验 · Source pending review
来源 · Source
出处备注：著录含书名，但缺版次 / 出版社 / 年份中的一部分，需编辑补全后才能做独立比对。
Hardin,《Science》(1968) 'The Tragedy of the Commons'
Garrett Hardin, Science (1968)
#公地悲剧 #公共资源 #集体行动
什么是搭便车问题（free-rider problem）？它为何阻碍公共品供给？
What is the free-rider problem, and why does it hinder public-goods provision?
搭便车指个体在不出资的情况下享受他人提供的公共品收益。由于公共品非排他，人人等待他人付费，结果供给不足甚至为零，需要税收或强制来破解。
Free-riding is enjoying a public good's benefits without paying. Because public goods are non-excludable, everyone waits for others to pay, leading to under-provision or none at all, resolved only by taxation or compulsion.
难度 进阶 · 适合 初中(12-15)
CC BY 4.0 · 已核验 · Verified 2026-11-02
来源 · Source
奥尔森《集体行动的逻辑》(1965)
Mancur Olson, The Logic of Collective Action (1965)
独立核验依据 · Independent verification: 核验依据 1 OPENLIBRARY 标识 /works/OL108561W：The logic of collective
#搭便车 #公共品 #集体困境
什么是公共品（public goods）？它与私人物品的核心区别是什么？
What are public goods, and how do they fundamentally differ from private goods?
公共品同时具有非排他性（难以排除他人使用）与非竞争性（一人使用不减少他人可得）。国防与灯塔是典型，而面包等私人物品则二者皆具对立属性，因此市场能自行供给后者却不愿供给前者。
Public goods are both non-excludable and non-rival, while private goods like bread are rival and excludable, so markets supply the latter but under-provide the former.
难度 进阶 · 适合 大众
CC BY 4.0 · 来源待核验 · Source pending review
来源 · Source
出处备注：著录含书名，但缺版次 / 出版社 / 年份中的一部分，需编辑补全后才能做独立比对。
萨缪尔森《公共支出的纯理论》(1954, AER)
Paul Samuelson, 'The Pure Theory of Public Expenditure' (1954, AER)
#公共品 #非排他性 #非竞争性
资源动员理论对“人们为什么会参与社会运动”给出了与经典集体行为理论不同的答案，区别在哪里？
How does resource mobilization theory answer the question of why people join social movements differently from classical collective behavior theory?
经典集体行为理论把运动归因于结构性紧张积累下的怨恨与失范，视其为情绪性的爆发。麦卡锡与扎尔德则指出不满几乎总是存在，真正的变量是能否动员金钱、组织网络、传播渠道和专业干部等资源，运动组织如同其他组织一样追求目标的理性化。由此，研究重心从心理状态转向组织生态、专业运动组织（SMO）与赞助结构之间的互动。
Classical collective behavior theory attributed movements to grievances and anomie bred by structural strain, treating them as emotional eruptions. McCarthy and Zald countered that grievances are nearly always present, so the real variable is whether resources—money, organizational networks, communication channels, professional staff—can be mobilized; movement organizations rationalize goals like any other organization. Research accordingly shifted from psychological states to organizational ecology, SMOs, and sponsor structures.
难度 进阶 · 适合 初中(12-15)
CC BY 4.0 · 已核验 · Verified 2026-10-04
来源 · Source
John D. McCarthy & Mayer N. Zald, "Resource Mobilization and Social Movements: A Partial Theory", American Journal of Sociology, 1977, 82(6): 1212–1241
John D. McCarthy & Mayer N. Zald, Resource Mobilization and Social Movements: A Partial Theory, American Journal of Sociology 82(6), 1977, pp. 1212-1241
独立核验依据 · Independent verification: 核验依据 1 DOI 10.1086/226464
#社会运动 #资源动员
社会运动为何通常依靠集体行动而不是个体申诉来推动变革?
Why do social movements push for change through collective action rather than individual appeals?
社会学家查尔斯·蒂利把社会运动界定为围绕共同诉求展开的持续性集体挑战,通过集会、请愿与公开声明向权力方施压。个体声音容易被忽视或压制,而集体行动能汇聚资源、制造政治压力并把议题送入公共议程。运动的成败还取决于政治机会结构与参与者之间的信任网络,这解释了相似的怨愤为何在不同时机会产生截然不同的动员效果。
Sociologist Charles Tilly defined social movements as sustained collective challenges built around common claims, pressuring powerholders through assemblies, petitions, and public statements. A lone voice is easily ignored or suppressed, whereas collective action pools resources, creates political pressure, and moves issues onto the public agenda. Movement outcomes also hinge on political opportunity structures and trust networks among participants, which is why similar grievances mobilize very differently at different moments.
难度 进阶 · 适合 大众
CC BY 4.0 · 来源待核验 · Source pending review
来源 · Source
出处备注：此条未指向带版次的可引用著作（通识性内容、机构文件或未展开的英文书名），本库不提供独立书目出处；如需精确引用，需由编辑补全具体篇目与版次。
Charles Tilly, Social Movements, 1768-2004, Paradigm Publishers, 2004年。
Charles Tilly, Social Movements, 1768-2004, Paradigm Publishers, 2004.
#社会运动 #集体行动